Legal Opinion
Grosz v. State of Ind.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided February 21, 1990No. IP 85-968-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
TINDER, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to some claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and on failure to state a claim as to the remaining claims pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
I. Background,
According to the complaint, plaintiff Ha-nus J. Grosz, M.D., was a licensed and board certified psychiatrist who entered into two written contracts with the Indiana Department of Corrections (department) in July 1983 to provide…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colburn v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- DeHarder Investment Corp. v. Indiana Housing Finance AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Board of Trustees v. LandryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- West v. PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- HARDIN v. BURGHERDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.