Legal Opinion
Winkler v. Solem
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 17, 1981No. CIV80-4006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
NICHOL, Senior District Judge.
Petitioner, Mark Winkler, seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus, alleging that his confinement under the custody of Herman Solem, Warden of the South Dakota Penitentiary, is based upon a conviction in state court for aggravated assault as defined by S.D.C.L. 22-18-1.1(3) that was the result of proceedings that deprived him of constitutionally protected rights. Specifically, the petitioner alleges that the state proceedings were constitutionally invalid for the following reasons:
I. The State did not move to have the names of witnesses endorsed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Michael Timm Rinehart v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden of the Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Curtis Dale Morrow v. Robert F. Parratt, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Roy C. Reynolds v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Zemina v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1977
- George Frank Lindner v. Donald W. Wyrick, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hence v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Mark Winckler v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982