Legal Opinion

Mayo Hotel Company v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1956No. 37120PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. ■

This case was instituted by Elizabeth Cooper against the Mayo Hotel Company, a corporation, operating a hotel in Tulsa, to recover damages on account of false imprisonment. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000, the amount sued for. Upon consideration of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, the court ordered that unless plaintiff remit all over $4,000 the motion for a new trial would be sustained, whereupon plaintiff filed'her remittitur of $1,000. Judgment was then rendered for $4,000 damages, the motion for a new trial was overruled, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Alsup v. Skaggs Drug CenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ayala Córdova v. San Juan Racing Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
  2. Dobbins v. Hato Rey Psychiatric Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Oldham Ex Rel. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API