Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny by trick and has appealed.

On the 18th day of April, 1962, defendant purported to purchase a new automobile from the prosecuting witness, a dealer, and was given its possession. He gave therefor a worthless check in the sum of $450 and executed for the balance a conditional sales contract upon which he made no payments. He used the name W. D. Thompson instead of his actual name •which was James Dale Thompson.

The defendant first challenges his conviction on the ground that his motion for a dismissal of the indictment was improperly denied. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SabinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Lilly v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Neel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. FonteOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API