Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Mascarenas

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1972No. 887Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur with the result in the majority opinion. We cannot condone the state’s conduct which so delays a defendant’s right to a speedy trial that it violates Article II, § 14 of the New Mexico Constitution.

To me, an important point to decide is the constitutionality of the statute under which defendant was convicted.

A. Section 40A-Ó-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 6), Contributing to Delinquency Act is Unconstitutional.

The first claimed error raised by defendant was the constitutionality of § 40A-6-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6), the contributing delinquency Act. Defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. McKinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. LeybaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Entertainment Ventures, Inc. v. BrewerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API