State v. Mascarenas
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge
(specially concurring).
I concur with the result in the majority opinion. We cannot condone the state’s conduct which so delays a defendant’s right to a speedy trial that it violates Article II, § 14 of the New Mexico Constitution.
To me, an important point to decide is the constitutionality of the statute under which defendant was convicted.
A. Section 40A-Ó-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 6), Contributing to Delinquency Act is Unconstitutional.
The first claimed error raised by defendant was the constitutionality of § 40A-6-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6), the contributing delinquency Act. Defendant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. McKinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. LeybaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Entertainment Ventures, Inc. v. BrewerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.