Legal Opinion

State v. Oliva

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 29, 2003No. 21056-1-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

A plea bargain is a contract. And we interpret it as such. As part of a plea agreement, the State agreed to recommend the special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA) if Jose Oliva were amenable. At a plea hearing, the State told the judge that it would agree to SSOSA if Mr. Oliva were amenable. The court ordered a presentence investigation report (PSI) and an evaluation at Eastern State Hospital, requested by Mr. Oliva. The PSI concluded that Mr. Oliva’s financial situation and multiple substance abuse problems made him a poor candidate for SSOSA. The doctors at Eastern State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Scott Galvanizing, Inc. v. Northwest EnviroServices, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CosnerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Jason SpauldingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. John Doe G v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of QuinnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Wa/dept. Of Corrections, Resp/cross-app v. Isaac Zamora, App/cross-resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API