State v. Oliva
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
A plea bargain is a contract. And we interpret it as such. As part of a plea agreement, the State agreed to recommend the special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA) if Jose Oliva were amenable. At a plea hearing, the State told the judge that it would agree to SSOSA if Mr. Oliva were amenable. The court ordered a presentence investigation report (PSI) and an evaluation at Eastern State Hospital, requested by Mr. Oliva. The PSI concluded that Mr. Oliva’s financial situation and multiple substance abuse problems made him a poor candidate for SSOSA. The doctors at Eastern State…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Scott Galvanizing, Inc. v. Northwest EnviroServices, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CosnerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Jason SpauldingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- John Doe G v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- In re the Personal Restraint of QuinnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Wa/dept. Of Corrections, Resp/cross-app v. Isaac Zamora, App/cross-resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.