Legal Opinion

State v. Cosner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1975No. 43154, 43193, 43208PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Two applications for writs of habeas cor pus and one petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to CrR 7.7 have been consolidated for consideration. They raise the question of whether the petitioners, prior to their respective guilty pleas, received adequate notice of mandatory minimum penalties imposed pursuant to the “firearm” statute, RCW 9.41.025, 1 and the “deadly weapon” statute, RCW 9.95.040 2 for the use of guns in the commission of crimes.

Petitioner Cosner was initially charged with first-degree assault and second-degree burglary. Plea bargaining ensued as a result of which he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. PringleWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. State v. ComaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API