Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.

On Motions for Rehearing.

■HALL, C. J.

The appellant contends that this court erred in. the interpretation of the jury’s finding upon issue No. 1, for the reason that the record shows that such finding, when taken in connection with the finding upon issue No. 2, was an interpretation of the contract upon its face, outside the jury’s province, and- in further holding that the second issue was immaterial. The first issue asked the jury to find what is meant by the contract, .meaning of course, the writing considered in connection with the verbal testimony introduced by both sides and throwing…