Legal Opinion
Kistler v. Latham
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 28, 1923No. 394-3730PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCLENDON, P. j.
This was an action for damages by Latham, and others against Kistler and others for alleged breach of a contract for the sale of an oil and gas lease. Defendants recovered in the trial court, and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed that judgment, and rendered judgment for plaintiffs. 235 S. W. 938.
The controlling' question in the case is whether a parol modification of the contract *984was within .the'statute of frauds. The contract is copied in full in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, and a very full statement of the case is made. It will therefore only be necessary to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Burnett v. AtteberryTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Clegg v. BrannanTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Francis v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Garcia v. KaramTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Brownwood v. Texas Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.