State v. Haynes
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The three cases have been consolidated for the purposes of appeal, and involve the construction of act 99, approved March 4,1927. Acts of 1927, p. 257. Under § 1 of the act there is a proviso that the term “motor vehicles” or “motor-propelled vehicles” as used in the act shall only include a motor vehicle operating a service between cities or towns. The section also provides that the term “improved public highway,” wherever used in the act, means every improved public highway in the State which is or may hereafter be declared to be a part of the State…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ford v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Clements v. Crawford County BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Murray v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
3Cited by6 opinions
- Texas Turnpike Authority v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Golden Gate Scenic Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Southeast Arkansas Levee District v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Shipley Baking Company v. HartfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.