Tony Lavan v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WARDLAW; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
Appellees, nine homeless individuals living in the “Skid Row” district of Los Angeles, charge that the City of Los Angeles *1024(the “City”) violated their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by seizing and immediately destroying their unabandoned personal possessions, temporarily left on public sidewalks while Appellees attended to necessary tasks such as eating, showering, and using restrooms. Finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits of these claims, the district court enjoined the City from…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Lamya Brewster v. Charlie BeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Warkentine v. SoriaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- United States v. Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Mateos-Sandoval v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.