Legal Opinion
Board of Drainage Commissioners of Jackson County District No. 2 v. Karr & Moore
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 17, 1924No. 3904PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The deposit by plaintiffs with the board of drainage commissioners of their check was to insure the execution of a bond by the contractors for the faithful performance of such contract as might be entered into between these parties for this work in accordance with the terms of the drainage act. Acts 1911, pp. 108, 120; 1 Park’s Code, § 439(u). The board of drainage commissioners would not be authorized to collect the check, and appropriate the proceeds to the use and benefit of the drainage district, unless the board accepted the competitive bid of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayer v. . McCreeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Petze v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Manly Building Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Sherry v. ProalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Bird v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hartrampf v. Citizens & Southern Realty InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Mike Doll, Ronald Elbon and Kent Langworthy v. Grand Union CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Russell v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Wells v. H. W. Lay Company Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Lindsey v. GuhlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.