Legal Opinion

Hungarian General Credit-Bank v. Titus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Edward H. Titus, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of September, 1916, vacating and setting aside an order directing plaintiff to give security for costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

The action was commenced in March, 1916, and the amended answer served upon May thirteenth of that year. On May seventeenth the plaintiff noticed the case for trial for the June term. The defendant served his notice of trial on May twentieth. On. July nineteenth the defendant moved to serve a supplemental answer, which motion was granted on July twenty-fifth, and the supplemental answer served on August 4, 1916. On September 19, 1916, an order was made requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs. From a subsequent order vacating this order this appeal has been taken.

*508The sole…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. GriswoldNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Belford v. Faulk & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API