Legal Opinion

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 13, 1953No. Civ. 3678PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a manufacturer of drug products, seeks an injunction restraining the defendants, operators of two supermarkets- in the City of New Orleans, from selling its products below the minimum retail sale price fixed pursuant to the Louisiana Fair Trade Act. 1 Defendants, admitting sales in violation of the act, challenge its constitutionality as well as .the constitutionality of the McGuire Act, 2 which exempts state fair trade acts from the provisions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. 3

The Louisiana Fair Trade Act is similar to the fair trade acts now in existence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. General Electric Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Sunbeam Corporation v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1956
  4. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super MarketsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
  5. Lionel Corp. v. Grayson-Robinson StoresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API