Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided December 17, 2024No. 3:14-cv-00374Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MELVIN GENE HODGES, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 3:14-CV-374-RAH-SMD ) [WO] JOHN Q. HAMM, Commissioner, ) Alabama Department of Corrections, ) et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ORDER Pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Petitioner has filed a Motion to Alter or Amend (Doc. 53) this court’s September 4, 2024, Memorandum Opinion (Doc. 51) and Judgment (Doc. 52) denying him habeas corpus relief. For the following reasons, the motion will be DENIED. STANDARD OF REVIEW Rule 59(e)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API