Legal Opinion

Gothberg v. Town of Plainville

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 4, 2015No. 3:13-CV-01121(CSH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF HEARING

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Erik Gothberg’s motion to substitute pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (doc. 71) and motion for enlargement of time (doe. 76) until thirty days after the Court assigns a hearing date on the motion to substitute to serve the notice of hearing on the non-party sought to be substituted. Defendants Town of Southington, Michael Shanley, Jay Suski a/k/a John Suski and Scott Wojenkski (“Southington Defendants”) object to the motion for enlargement of time. For the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Brian Barlow v. George Ground, Officer 9129 L.O. Oberlies, Officer 1706 A. Tucker, Officer 9363 Ray Shay, Officer 3269Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 966, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 1125 Caroline P. Ayres v. Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A. Robert Jacobs, Individually and as an Agent/senior Partner Thomas C. Crumplar, Individually and as an Agent/senior Partner Douglas B. Canfield, Individually and as an Agent/senior PartnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
Wardell Giles v. Gary CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
Hardy v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Thuman v. DembskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023