Legal Opinion
State v. O'CONNOR
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 5, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-066PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
Giovanni Vigliotto, a.k.a. Nikolai Peruskov, 1 appeals from the trial court’s ruling that the Arizona Department of Corrections (“DOC”) properly disbursed $8,423.32 to the clerk of the superior court from his “inmate trust account” in partial satisfaction of a restitution lien. Vigliotto contends the restitution lien statute, Ariz.Rev. StatAnn. (“A.R.S.”) section 13-806, is an invalid ex post facto law as applied to him, that the DOC deprived him of due process of law under the state and federal constitutions when it filed a restitution lien against his inmate trust account…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Walters v. GrossheimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Dunn v. DunnMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Larkin v. State Ex Rel. RottasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Matter of Estate of VigliottoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.