Legal Opinion

Northouse v. Torstenson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1945No. 31944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action in equity to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The trial court found for the defendant and dismissed the plaintiffs’ petition, from which the plaintiffs appealed.

The plaintiffs and appellants assign as errors that the judgment is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law, for errors of law occurring at the trial and duly excepted to by the plaintiffs, and for the error in overruling plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial.

The evidence discloses that David A. Ommerman, the grandfather of the plaintiff George Northouse,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Gunnell v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Albers v. KozeluhNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Shonsey v. ClaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Robinson v. BresslerNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Podewitz v. GERING NATIONAL BANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Holoubek v. RomshekNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Siedel v. SniderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Loew's Inc. v. WolffDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API