Legal Opinion

Roth v. United States

District Court, D. Montana

Decided December 12, 2003No. 02-44-M-LBEPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

In March 2002, Stephen and Jean Roth (Plaintiffs) commenced this action under the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, seeking to quiet title to several easements over federal land. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which are now fully briefed. Having reviewed those briefs and the materials of record, and considered argument of counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. #29] is granted. Specifically, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted with respect to their claim that they possess an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Kern River Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pine River Irrigation District v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  2. Allen Family Trust v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API