Roth v. United States
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
In March 2002, Stephen and Jean Roth (Plaintiffs) commenced this action under the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, seeking to quiet title to several easements over federal land. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which are now fully briefed. Having reviewed those briefs and the materials of record, and considered argument of counsel,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. #29] is granted. Specifically, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted with respect to their claim that they possess an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kern River Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pine River Irrigation District v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Allen Family Trust v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019