Caudill v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO. OF COLUMBUS, OHIO
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.
Defendant’s one assignment of error made in compliance with the rules of this Court, Steelman v. Benfield, 228 N.C. 651, 46 S.E. 2d 829, raises the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand the motion for nonsuit. To recover under the contract of insurance upon which she sues, plaintiff must offer evidence from which the jury could find: (1) that the operator of a hit-and-run automobile, as defined by paragraph 11(d) of Endorsement #644, caused bodily injury which resulted in her intestate’s death; (2) that plaintiff, as intestate’s personal representative, is legally entitled…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Van Bibber v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Jenkins v. Leftwich Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Dodd v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Ives v. Sunfish Sign Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- SE FIDELITY INS. CO. v. BroughtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Ward v. Beaunit Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982