Legal Opinion
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. Romm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 3, 2008No. 07-2681PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Pearle Vision, Inc. (“Pearle Vision”) filed suit against Victor Romm and three of his companies alleging violations of their franchise agreements. The district court entered a preliminary injunction directing Romm to make certain items, including patient files, available to Pearle Vision. The district court eventually found that Romm was not complying with the injunction, and entered a $1,000 per day contempt sanction to remain in effect until the items at issue were provided to Pearle Vision. After finding that Romm never complied with its order, the district court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Karamo B. Kaba v. E.A. Stepp, Mickal E. Laird, Dave Benson, and Joseph YonkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Rothwell Cotton Company, a Texas Corporation v. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Milton M. Dowell, Appeal Of: Donald v. MoranoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Collins v. IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Loubser v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Turner v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Aku v. Chi. Bd. of Educ.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Robinson v. Champaign Unit 4 School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.