Legal Opinion

Philip George Stuart, Sr. v. United States of America, Mons Kapoor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1987No. 85-4421, 86-3791PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*245BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Stuart and Kapoor, citizens and residents of Canada, appeal the district court’s denial of their petitions to quash summonses of records held by their bank in Bellingham, Washington. The Internal Revenue Service issued the summonses at the request of the Canadian Department of National Revenue, pursuant to Articles XIX and XXI of the 1942 Income Tax Convention with Canada.

FACTS

Philip Stuart and Mons Kapoor (taxpayers) are citizens and residents of Canada. Both have accounts with the Northwestern Commercial Bank in Bellingham, Washington. In an attempt to determine…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Kahn Lucas Lancaster, Inc. v. Lark International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. AbrahamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Vincent De Frontbrune v. Alan WofsyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API