Legal Opinion

State v. Simpkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 2019No. COA18-725PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*326Defendant appeals his convictions for resisting a public officer and failing to exhibit/surrender his license. Because the trial court did not properly instruct defendant on waiver of the right to counsel under North Carolina General Statute § 15A-1242 and because defendant did not forfeit his right to such an instruction, we conclude defendant must receive a new trial.

I. Background

In July of 2016, Officer Trent Middlebrook of the City of Locust was on patrol; he ran the "tag" of a vehicle and discovered that the owner of the vehicle, defendant, had a suspended driver's license…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. McCrowreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HarvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  2. State v. HarvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  3. State v. HarvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. HarvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API