Liddell v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, Justice,
for the Court.
¶ 1. In this felony drug-sale case, the defendant claims she received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Because we find her trial counsel’s actions fell within the large ambit of “reasonable professional assistance,” we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics Agent Luis Hawkins, Tunica Police Officer Chris Smith, and a confidential informant (“C.I.”) set up a drug buy at Brenda Lid-dell’s home. The officers equipped the C.I. with a camera and microphone and sent him to Liddell’s home to buy an ounce of cocaine.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by39 opinions
- Chamberlin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Grayson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- Charles Ray Crawford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Grossley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
- Kelvin D. Ashford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.