Grossley v. State

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Peter Grossley appeals after being convicted of aggravated assault and armed robbery based in part on accomplice testimony. He argues that the testimony was *1146suspect and contradictory and that both convictions should be reversed. While there are some inconsistencies in the accomplices’ testimonies, we find their testimonies are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence to support both convictions. Thus, we reject his challenges to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence and affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2. On July 25, 2007, Thomas Moore and Grossley…