Legal Opinion
United States v. Coles, Terence
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 8, 2005No. 03-3113PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed Per Curiam.
2Per curiam
This case raises an important issue left open by the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), concerning the application of the plain-error doctrine to appeals from sentences rendered under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines before the Supreme Court ruled that they are advisory rather than mandatory. In addressing this issue, we align ourselves generally with the decisions of the Second Circuit in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), and the Seventh Circuit in United States v.…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Dorcely, DanielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.