Legal Opinion

Sequoia ForestKeeper v. Benson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 5, 2015No. l:14-cv-00341 LJO SKOPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 47 & 55)

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Sequoia ForestKeeper (“For-estKeeper”) challenges the United States Forest Service’s (“Forest Service”) Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (“Decision Notice”) for the Hume Roadside and Recreation Site Hazard Tree Project (“Hume Hazard Tree Project” or “Project”) in the Giant Sequoia National Monument (“the Monument”) under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq., the National Forest Management Act…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AquAlliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API