Seilhamer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
I respectfully dissent.
After recommitting Seilhamer as a convicted parole violator to serve his unexpired term of two months and twenty-five days, the Board set a new maximum term expiry of February 11, 2009. Because the maximum term of Seilhamer’s confinement has expired, the instant appeal is moot. Taylor v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 746 A.2d 671 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000); Lawson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 105 Pa.Cmwlth. 427, 524 A.2d 1053 (1987); Sands v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 189, 896…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- McCaskill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Smith v. Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Craig v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.