State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant petitions for reconsideration, challenging our opinion, State v. Wright, 167 Or App 297, 999 P2d 1220 (2000), in many respects. We allow the petition to correct one statement in our opinion and reject defendant’s other challenges without discussion.
Our opinion states:
“Defendant responds that ‘sufficiency’ under subsection (4) and ‘definiteness and certainty’ under subsection (2) and ORS 132.550(7) are distinct concepts and distinct requirements generally analogous in the civil context to the bases for a motion to dismiss for ‘failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. AndreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.