Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Wichita Farm Lighting Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 2, 1934No. 13,080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Hoffman and defendant in error as the company.

The company, through its agent, by written contract dated March 22,1931 (hereinafter referred to as A), sold Hoffman certain lighting and heating equipment, for $498. It was provided by A that Hoffman should pay by note due December 1,1931, without interest. Hoffman neither executed such a note nor paid otherwise, and June 5,. 1931, the company brought this suit for said sum.

The defense was a certain oral guaranty, which it was alleged was to be, but was not, written int'o the contract. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canon City Industrial Stores Co. v. McInerneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Balcom v. MichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Brown v. BarthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Loveland v. TurnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colowyo Coal Co. v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Karakehian v. BoyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API