Legal Opinion

Canon City Industrial Stores Co. v. McInerney

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 1922No. 10,260PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action on promissory note. Judgment of dismissal. Error to the District Court of Fremont County, Hon. James L. Cooper, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

Plaintiff in error began an action against defendant in error to recover upon a promissory note given for the balance of a sum agreed, in a subscription contract, to be paid by the defendant in error for two shares of stock of the plaintiff in error. The contract was set out in full in the complaint. The defendant filed an answer alleging that the note was given without consideration; and for a second defense that he had been induced to sign the note and contract by misrepresentations made by an agent of the plaintiff, whom he had known for many years, and in whom he had great confidence.

A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colorado Investment Loan Co. v. BeuchatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Witcher v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Balcom v. MichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Saul v. LapidusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frankie J. King and Beverly J. King, and Cross-Appellants v. Horizon Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Owen v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Barnebey v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Trujillo v. Wichita Farm Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Hoffman v. Wichita Farm Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API