Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kiesel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2004PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBender, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed upon Appellant, Michael Kiesel, after he pled guilty to three counts of Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (IDSI) and two counts of Corruption of Minors, and pled no contest to two counts of Aggravated Indecent Assault. Appellant raises one issue on appeal: whether the trial court gave adequate weight to mental and emotional findings of psychiatrists and counselors when imposing the sentence? Since Appellant has failed to include a statement pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) and the Commonwealth has objected to the omission, we may not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DunphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. YeomansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. PriskSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. RobertsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API