Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided August 13, 1976No. ACM 22018PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EARLY, Senior Judge:
Tried by general court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of possessing and selling heroin in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for nine months and reduction to airman basic.
Appellate defense counsel assign five errors. Of these, two are either without merit or were considered in the review of the staff judge advocate and correctly resolved against the accused.
In their first assignment, appellate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. Chavez-ReyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. EckU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. MurrayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. StandleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. MarlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. KurigerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.