Thomas Mickens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Until 1996, a federal prisoner was allowed to file an initial application challenging his sentence on federal grounds “at any time.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994). Effective April 24, 1996, however, § 105 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA” or the “Act”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, § 105, 110 Stat. 1214, 1220 (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2255), imposed a one-year limitations'period on the filing qf such applications. In. the present ease, federal prisoner Thomas Mickens appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- James C. Flanagan v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. James Marcello and Anthony ZizzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HurstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Anthony Ross v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.