Legal Opinion

Helis v. Ward

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 1940No. 68PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract to purchase a mineral lease brought by respondents, as vendors. The contract price was to be determined pursuant to a formula. based upon the production of certain designated wells on the property. That price was fixed at $300,000 “if the average daily production of said wells for a period of fifteen, days after completion is less than 3,000 barrels each, calculated on a %-inch choke according to the methods usually employed in gauging the capacity of oil wells.” In case the production, calculated in that manner, was more than 3,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Saunders v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Jack L. Edwards v. Selective Service Local Board No. 111, Newton County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Karn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Knox v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API