Maher v. County of Alameda
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARGULIES, Acting P. J.
Surgeons implanted a biliary stent in plaintiff Brendan Maher during emergency abdominal surgery in 1996. Maher alleges he was unaware of the stent’s placement until it was discovered and removed in August 2010 after he sought treatment for abdominal pain. In April 2011, Maher sued the health care providers who treated him in 1996 and 1997 for professional negligence in not timely removing the stent, or informing him of its placement and the fact it was designed to be temporary. Defendants successfully demurred on statute of limitations grounds, and Maher appeals…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Banga v. LustigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Weaver v. Do CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015