Legal Opinion

Lucid v. McDowell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1918No. 442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGHTOWER, O. J.

This is an original proceeding in. this court for the writ of mandamus, brought by Tom Lucid and his wife and Henry Weber, as relators, in which Hon. E. A. McDowell, as judge of the Sixtieth judicial district, is made respondent. The purpose of the proceeding is to compel said respondent to proceed to judgment on a plea of privilege interposed by relators in a certain habeas corpus proceeding, which was commenced before said respondent as district judge, on the 28th day of September. 1918, in which proceeding Kezzie Turnipseed and her husband, J. H. Turnipseed, are re-lators,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Legate v. LegateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Finney v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Craig v. Pittman & Harrison Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Brooks v. Wichita Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. O'Quinn v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Walker v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Galewsky v. W. R. Kyser Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API