Legal Opinion

Finney v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1912PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hunt County; T. D. Montrose, Judge. Habeas corpus proceedings by R. H. Fin-ney against Mrs. Lila Walker. From an order changing the venue, the petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by the appellant, R. H. Finney, to recover, by means of the writ of habeas corpus, from the appellee, Mrs. Lila Walker, the custody and possession of his minor son, Harry Boyett Finney. The petition is as follows:

“State of Texas, County of Hunt. District Court, Sixty-Second District, Hunt County, Tex. To Hon. T. D. Montrose, Judge of said Court: The petition of R. H. Finney, who resides in Hunt county, Texas, would represent to your honor that Harry Boyett Finney, his minor son, who is about eight (8) years of age, is illegally restrained of his liberty, and is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Legate v. LegateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pittman v. ByarsTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ex Parte ReedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Ex Parte Gertrude BerryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Knollhoff v. NorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Keith v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Vickers v. FaubionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Glenn v. MilamTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. O'Quinn v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API