Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bryan v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 2008No. 1071590 and 1071662Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, Justice

I concur in the result in both eases.

In essence, the action filed by Raymond C. Bryan, Rodney James, and Jonathan Thompkins (hereinafter “the petitioners”) is a collateral attack on the election-contest proceedings conducted by the Republican Party in regard to the primary election for the circuit judgeship for the Seventh Judicial Circuit. To the extent Bryan sought a judgment declaring those election-contest proceedings invalid, the trial court had jurisdiction to proceed. Bryan’s status as the contestee adversely affected by the election-contest proceedings is analogous to that of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Avery Freight Lines, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Boyd v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Harvey v. City of OneontaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Davis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Roper v. RhodesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API