Bryan v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceSmith, Justice
I concur in the result in both eases.
In essence, the action filed by Raymond C. Bryan, Rodney James, and Jonathan Thompkins (hereinafter “the petitioners”) is a collateral attack on the election-contest proceedings conducted by the Republican Party in regard to the primary election for the circuit judgeship for the Seventh Judicial Circuit. To the extent Bryan sought a judgment declaring those election-contest proceedings invalid, the trial court had jurisdiction to proceed. Bryan’s status as the contestee adversely affected by the election-contest proceedings is analogous to that of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Avery Freight Lines, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Boyd v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Harvey v. City of OneontaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Davis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Roper v. RhodesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008