Legal Opinion

Heidbrink v. McKesson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1923No. Nos. 3781, 3782PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

These patents relate to devices for administering anaesthetics. Nitrous oxide was commonly used where effectiveness for very short periods was sufficient, as in tooth extraction; but if its administration was long continued it became dangerous. Accordingly a process was developed by which oxygen could be mixed with the nitrous oxide, and a more prolonged use of the anaesthetic became feasible. In practice, the operator procured his gases from prepared tanks, which contained the respective gases at high pressure, and in that form were a market product. It was found that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Davis Sewing Mach. Co. v. New Departure Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Application of Charles T. FuettererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Campbell v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Black-Clawson Co. v. Centrifugal Engineering & Patents Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  5. Cleveland Punch & Shear Works Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API