Barcena v. Taylorsville City Police Department
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION EDMUNDO BARCENA, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Plaintiff, ORDER PERMITTING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TEMPORARILY v. GRANTING MOTION TO WAIVE FILING FEE (DOC. NO. 2) TAYLORSVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; SCOTT LLOYD; Case No. 2:24-cv-00592 ANDREW KYLE; and JEFFERY TROY WATTERS, Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Defendants. Plaintiff Edmundo Barcena filed this action without an attorney and without paying the filing fee.1 The court temporarily granted Mr. Barcena’s motion to proceed without paying the fee and stayed the case for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.