Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Blackford, J. —

This was an indictment for retailing, spirituous liquors by a less quantity than a quart without license. Plea, not guilty. The cause was submitted to the Court. There was but one witness examined, and his testimony was as follows:

In Decatur county, and within a year before the finding of the indictment, the defendant kept whisky for sale by the quart, (having no license to retail,) and the witness was in the frequent habit of taking a pint bottle and going to the defendant’s for liquor. The witness always bought a quart at a time, but had it drawn in the pint bottle, and after…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lester v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Commercial National Bank v. GilletteIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  4. Dobson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State v. MaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API