Legal Opinion
State v. Cronin
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George B. Ceresia, Jr., J.
The above-captioned action has been brought by the State of *810New York pursuant to article 12 of the Navigation Law by reason of an alleged petroleum discharge at the former Cronin’s Mini-Market, Main Street (Route 22), Peru, New York. From March 1958 to April 1968 the site was owned by an entity known as Copeland Oil which operated an automotive service/ gasoline station thereon. In April 1968 the site was purchased by Sun Oil Company, predecessor of Sunoco, Inc. (Sunoco). On December 14, 1977 the site was sold to Isadore and Evelyn Montgomery.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Domermuth Petroleum Equipment & Maintenance Corp. v. Herzog & Hopkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- State v. MontayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Quaker State Corp. v. United States Coast GuardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Premier National Bank v. Effron Fuel Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Dora Homes, Inc. v. EppersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- State v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006