Legal Opinion

In Re Oak Street Kansas City v. McTernan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 23, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

This controversy grows out of a proceeding to widen and extend a street under the provisions of the Charter of Kansas City. The street sought to be widened and extended is Oak, a north-and-south street. As now established it extends from 'Eighth on the north to Twentieth on the south and is fifty-six feet wide. Admiral Boulevard — an east-and-west street— lies a block north of Eighth, and the right of way, tracks and a freight yard of the Kansas City Terminal Railway Company lie immediately south of Twentieth, also an east-and-west street. On December 12, 1921, an ordinance was passed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Kansas City v. SmartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Jasper Land & Improvement Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  4. Perkins v. FieldingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. City of Kirksville v. HinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. MyattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Republic v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Kansas City v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Fort Osage Drainage District of Jackson County v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API