In Re Oak Street Kansas City v. McTernan
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.
This controversy grows out of a proceeding to widen and extend a street under the provisions of the Charter of Kansas City. The street sought to be widened and extended is Oak, a north-and-south street. As now established it extends from 'Eighth on the north to Twentieth on the south and is fifty-six feet wide. Admiral Boulevard — an east-and-west street— lies a block north of Eighth, and the right of way, tracks and a freight yard of the Kansas City Terminal Railway Company lie immediately south of Twentieth, also an east-and-west street. On December 12, 1921, an ordinance was passed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kansas City v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Kansas City v. SmartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Jasper Land & Improvement Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Perkins v. FieldingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- City of Kirksville v. HinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. MyattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- State Ex Rel. City of Republic v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Kansas City v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Fort Osage Drainage District of Jackson County v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.