Legal Opinion

Starr v. Swain

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1914No. 22,339PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Henry Circuit Court; Eugene Bundy, Special Judge. Drainage proceedings on the petition of Calvin R. Swain and others. From a judgment establishing the drain, John L. Starr and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

1

In February, 1910, appellees filed a petition in the Henry Circuit Court to establish a drain located in the counties of Henry, Delaware and Madison. A number of landowners, including some of the appellants, filed a petition to be made parties to the proceeding so that they might have the right to join in a two-thirds remonstrance against the proposed work. §6142 Burns 1914, Acts 1907 p. 508. The court sustained appellees’ demurrer, for wants of facts, to this petition, and it is contended that such ruling was erroneous. The petition states that each petitioner is a “resident landowner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. State, ex rel. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Schleuter v. CanatsyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hutchinson v. TrauermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pub. Serv. Com. v. Marion C. Ct.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Marion Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. South Bend Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Roney v. RodgersIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API