Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Inogen

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 9, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00411Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION LINTON J. GRIFFIN, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-411-ALM-KPJ § INOGEN, § § Defendant. § REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant Inogen’s (“Defendant”) Second Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b) and Brief in Support (the “Second Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. 15), to which Plaintiff Linton J. Griffin (“Plaintiff”) filed a response (the “Response”) (Dkt. 18), Defendant filed a reply (the “Reply”) (Dkt. 19), and Plaintiff filed a sur-reply (the “Sur-Reply”) (Dkt. 21). For the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API