Smee v. Checker Cab Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
Appellant contends that the jury’s damage appraisals are excessive, unsupported by credible evidence, and based on conjecture and speculation. We agree that such is the case with respect to the figures for medical and hospital expense and loss of wages, but consider that the award for pain and suffering may be sustained.
Pam and suffering — $2,500. Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we must, it makes a case substantially as follows:
The most-serious injury resulting from the accident was that to plaintiff’s head. There was a cut on the head which bled. When…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maslow Cooperage Corp. v. Weeks Pickle Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Wenneman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Timm v. RahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Czapinski v. Thomas Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Karsten v. MeisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Michalski v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Pucci v. RauschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Yelk v. SeefeldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.