Legal Opinion

Sondergard v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1992No. WD 44046PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Judge.

Robert L. Sondergard and Rita A. Son-dergard filed suit against Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL) for injuries sustained by them when their automobile was struck by another automobile which had swerved to avoid a pole belonging to KCPL which obstructed much of the traveled portion of the street. The jury returned a verdict in favor of KCPL but the court granted the Sondergards a new trial. KCPL contends the court granted a new trial on a discretionary ground which was not timely raised and for erroneously admitting evidence which was in fact proper. Reversed and remanded.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Marshall v. BobbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WarnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Stretch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Castle v. Modern Farm Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGraw v. AndesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Spencer v. Millstone Marina, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bank of Kirksville v. First Bank CentreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. ChristieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Nguyen v. BuffingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API