Legal Opinion

Marshall Mfg. Co. v. Verhalen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1942No. 13208PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Chief Justice.

Appellant, as plaintiff below, instituted this suit against Walter Verhalen et al. for infringement of its trade-mark on bushel and half-bushel fruit and vegetable shipping baskets, and for unfair competition in that respect, for injunction, and for damages. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, on motion of the defendants, the trial court peremptorily instructed the jury to return a verdict against the appellant and, in judgment, denied it the relief sought.

The trade-mark of appellant’s baskets is one continuous red stave extending down one side of the baskets, under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Selby v. MatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Atlas Assurance Co. v. Atlas InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Plaza Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Dixiepig Corp. v. Pig Stand Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Numed, Inc. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Suniland Furniture Co. v. Sunnyland Wholesale Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. FuessDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
  4. Walters v. Building Maintenance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Auto Wax Co., Inc. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API