Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Michaelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926No. 19607. Department TwoPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The appellants allege that, in 1913, one Dittman orally agreed with them that he “would give the said plaintiffs all the property which he had in the United States of America.” They claim that they had been neighbors of Dittman for several years, that he had made his home with them, that they had cooked for him, done his washing, taken care of him while he was sick, and otherwise taken care of his wants and requirements, all without compensation. In 1913, Dittman returned to his native home in Germany, and died there in 1919. In 1925 this action was brought to recover property of which he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ConnableSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Edwall v. JessephWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kinney v. MurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. McClanahan v. McClanahanWashington Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jennings v. D'HoogheWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Resor v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Henry v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re Fischer's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Lager v. BerggrenWashington Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API